Thiruparankundram Hill Row: CJI Declines TN Govt’s Request for Urgent Listing in Supreme Court

A major legal and political controversy continues to unfold in Tamil Nadu as the Supreme Court declined the state government’s oral request for urgent listing of its plea related to the Thiruparankundram Hill dispute. Chief Justice of India (CJI) refused to take up the matter immediately, stating that the court would examine the request through the standard listing process.

What Happened?

The Tamil Nadu government moved the Supreme Court seeking urgent relief in the ongoing Thiruparankundram Hill issue. When the state’s counsel made an oral mentioning for immediate listing, the CJI declined, noting that the matter could not be fast-tracked without proper procedure.

Background of the Controversy

Thiruparankundram Hill, a historically and culturally significant site, has recently become the center of legal disputes involving:

• Land usage rights
• Environmental concerns
• Religious and cultural sensitivities
• Alleged encroachments and construction activities

Local groups, activists, and political stakeholders have raised objections over developments at the site, prompting the state government to seek judicial clarity.

Why the Urgent Listing Was Sought

The TN government argued that immediate intervention was needed due to:

• Escalating tensions surrounding the hill
• Potential environmental risks
• Ongoing activities that may alter the character of the site

However, the Supreme Court emphasized that urgent listing cannot be granted only based on oral submissions.

What the Supreme Court Said

The CJI stated that the matter would be examined by the Registry and listed in due course, following standard Supreme Court protocols. This means the TN government will have to wait for the next available date as per the court’s schedule.

What Happens Next?

• The Registry will review the state’s plea and assign a hearing date.
• The Supreme Court may call for additional documentation or clarifications.
• The issue could be taken up soon, depending on its urgency and judicial workload.

Significance of the Case

The matter is important for Tamil Nadu due to:

• Cultural and religious importance of Thiruparankundram
• Environmental protection concerns
• Public sentiment and political implications

The delay may draw criticism from local groups who have been demanding swift judicial action.